ModLab UPenn the modular robotics laboratory at the university of pennsylvania

Modular Robot Connector Acceptance by Configuration Space Analysis
Modular Robot Connector Acceptance by Configuration Space Analysis
Attachment and detachment between modules is critical for modular robot reconfiguration, and is a key design area for these systems. By re-purposing the interpretation of a well-known motion planning tool in configuration space obstacles for its encoding of contact geometry, we have developed a method for determining a metric of the region of error tolerance (area of acceptance) in multiple dimensions by construction. Watershed analysis can then be used on this configuration-space model to determine the full shape and area of the region of capture for the connector pair. We have successfully classified the configuration space for several connectors using this method.

Configuration Space Representation

The configuration space is a well-understood method from path planning to represent a robot in the presence of obstacles. Using the Minkowski difference operation, we can ‘grow’ the obstacles according to the geometry of the robot. This creates a new set of obstacles in a space where the robot can be represented as a point rather than a shape. We model our two connectors as ‘robot’ and ‘obstacle’ in this configuration space and generate the corresponding ‘configuration space obstacle’. The outer surface boundary of this space is all configurations in which the two connectors are in contact, and we can perform analysis on this surface to find the ways the connectors will passively align.

Watershed Analysis

We assume the connectors are being driven towards each other by the robot in a single driven direction, with other degrees of freedom free for the connectors to move. For a pair of 2D connectors  this means traveling towards each other in y, with freedom of movement in x and theta (the single rotational degree of freedom)

We now need to find the set of all points whose path ends at the target docked configuration. If the system has a non-trivial AA, the target docked configuration will be at a local minimum and there will be a neighborhood of connected areas that flow to this minimum. For example, in Fig. 3 a configuration space obstacle is shown for the V-Face connector. The target docked configuration indicated with a white circle is at a minimum in Y on the surface. The set of points for which water droplets would flow to this minimum is termed a watershed

Our watershed algorithm carefully partitions the relevant surface polyhedra so that each has no more than one ‘downhill’ polyhedron. This allows us to transform the surface into a directed graph for characterization. With the graph in hand it is relatively easy to determine which polyhedra ‘flow’ to the target docked configuration, and then find an area for the region that results in docking.

Results

Once the area on the surface that converges to the target configuration is found, we flatten this area down to the plane and find the total area of the region. This area (which we call area of acceptance or AA) serves as a metric we can use to compare any given pair of connectors. Two different connector pair shapes were studied across two design parameters (center of rotation COR, and aspect ratio AR).  The two shapes examined were the X-Face and V-Face shapes, which have been examined previously.

Intuitively, the X-Face should provide a larger area of acceptance for all parameter combinations. However, our results show that for 4 of the parameter combinations tested, the V-Face area was actually larger. This information is potentially useful for robotic designers who may wish to build these shapes on robots with similar parameters, as it will allow easier docking under uncertainty.

Conclusion

We have introduced a new method of analysis for the area of acceptance of mechanical connectors under alignment. The method makes use of the configuration space obstacle representation of the connector pair and a new watershed determination method to find the region of attraction also known as the area of acceptance. The result is a metric we can use to compare the connectors and their range of acceptance. This information allows us to make informed decisions about connector design parameters in robotic contexts.

Publications
The full work will be presented at the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2017)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *